
Radeon PRO W6600M

Radeon RX 7600M
Radeon PRO W6600M vs Radeon RX 7600M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon PRO W6600M vs Radeon RX 7600M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon PRO W6600M vs Radeon RX 7600M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon PRO W6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Radeon RX 7600M is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
Radeon RX 7600M
2023Why buy it
- ✅10.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W6600M vs Radeon RX 7600M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W6600M
The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.

Radeon RX 7600M
The Radeon RX 7600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2410 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,999 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6600M scores 11,407 and the Radeon RX 7600M reaches 10,999 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6600M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX 7600M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7600M). Raw compute: 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 17.27 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600M). Boost clocks: 2034 MHz vs 2410 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 28 (Radeon RX 7600M).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,407+4% | 10,999 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.29 TFLOPS | 17.27 TFLOPS+137% |
| Boost Clock | 2034 MHz | 2410 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR 3 + AFMF |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 7600M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W6600M does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600M) — a 14.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 7600M. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6600M and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 7600M.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 256 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 7600M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 5+25% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600M). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7600M).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6600M draws 90W versus the Radeon RX 7600M's 90W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 7600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 500W (Radeon RX 7600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W | 90W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 126.7+4% | 122.2 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













