Quadro P5200 vs Radeon PRO W6600M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P5200

#16

Radeon PRO W7500

MSRP: $429|Avg: $401

133%

#18

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340

132%

#19

RTX A2000 12GB

MSRP: $449|Avg: $380

131%

#20

Radeon Pro Vega 56

MSRP: $399|Avg: $60

130%

#21

RTX A2000

MSRP: $450|Avg: $320

128%

#23

Intel Arc Pro B60

MSRP: $500|Avg: $450

118%

#24

Radeon PRO W7600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

118%

#25

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $625|Avg: $750

118%

#26

Radeon Pro Vega 48

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

107%

#27

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

MSRP: $500|Avg: $280

107%

#28

Quadro P5200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $240

100%

#29

Radeon PRO W7700

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

99%

#30

Radeon PRO W6600

MSRP: $649|Avg: $649

99%

#32

Radeon AI PRO R9700

MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1450

94%

#33

Radeon Pro Vega 64

MSRP: $599|Avg: $114

92%

#38

Radeon PRO W6600X

MSRP: $699|Avg: $699

81%

#41

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

77%

#42

Radeon Pro W5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $300

77%

#43

Radeon Pro W5700X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

76%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6600M

#2

Radeon PRO W6600M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#9

Intel Arc Pro B50

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

46%

#11

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $900|Avg: $300

44%

#16

Radeon PRO W7500

MSRP: $429|Avg: $401

41%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P5200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon PRO W6600M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro P5200	Radeon PRO W6600M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))	🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P5200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P5200 Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W6600M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5200 and Radeon PRO W6600M

Quadro P5200

The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.

Radeon PRO W6600M

The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P5200 scores 11,650 and the Radeon PRO W6600M reaches 11,407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon PRO W6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro P5200) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Raw compute: 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200) vs 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M). Boost clocks: 1746 MHz vs 2034 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P5200	Radeon PRO W6600M
G3D Mark Score	11,650+2%	11,407
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2560+43%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.94 TFLOPS+23%	7.29 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1746 MHz	2034 MHz+16%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	160+43%	112
L1 Cache	960 KB+88%	512 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P5200	Radeon PRO W6600M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P5200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600M has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W6600M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	Quadro P5200	Radeon PRO W6600M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5200) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.

Feature	Quadro P5200	Radeon PRO W6600M
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.1	1.2+9%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	5+25%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M).

Feature	Quadro P5200	Radeon PRO W6600M
Encoder	NVENC 5.0	VCN 3.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP7	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P5200 draws 100W versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 90W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5200) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Quadro P5200	Radeon PRO W6600M
TDP	100W	90W-10%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85°C	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	116.5	126.7+9%