Quadro P5200 vs Radeon Pro 5700
Quadro P5200
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro 5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P5200
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P5200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro 5700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro P5200 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P5200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $240 versus $250 for the Radeon Pro 5700, it costs 4% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 5.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P5200 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+5.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($240) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5200 and Radeon Pro 5700
Quadro P5200
The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.
Radeon Pro 5700
The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5200 scores 11,650 and the Radeon Pro 5700 reaches 11,469 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro P5200) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700). Raw compute: 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200) vs 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700). Boost clocks: 1746 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,650+2% | 11,469 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.94 TFLOPS+44% | 6.221 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1746 MHz+29% | 1350 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+11% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5200) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5200) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700).
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5200 draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 130W — a 26.1% difference. The Quadro P5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5200) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-23% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 116.5+32% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P5200 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $240, while the Radeon Pro 5700 launched at $799 and now averages $250. The Quadro P5200 costs 4% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.5 (Quadro P5200) vs 45.9 (Radeon Pro 5700) — the Quadro P5200 offers 5.7% better value. The Radeon Pro 5700 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-37% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $240-4% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.5+6% | 45.9 |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #230 | #238 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P5200 and Radeon Pro 5700
