Quadro P5200 vs Radeon Pro 5700

CPU

GPU

Quadro P5200

2018Core: 1556 MHzBoost: 1746 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon Pro 5700

2020Core: 1243 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Quadro P5200 vs Radeon Pro 5700 Performance Spectrum

Quadro P5200

4 GB 100

11,650

+1.6%

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

Radeon Pro 5700

8 GB 130

11,469

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P5200 vs Radeon Pro 5700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P5200 vs Radeon Pro 5700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P5200

2018

Why buy it

✅1.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 62.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon Pro 5700

2020

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P5200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌
59.8% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P5200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (11,650 vs 11,469), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 5700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 16nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2018. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P5200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $299 cheaper on MSRP at $500 vs $799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 62.3% (23.3 vs 14.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro P5200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 5700 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro P5200 vs Radeon Pro 5700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P5200

The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.

Radeon Pro 5700

The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P5200 scores 11,650 and the Radeon Pro 5700 reaches 11,469 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro P5200) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700). Raw compute: 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200) vs 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700). Boost clocks: 1746 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P5200	Radeon Pro 5700
G3D Mark Score	11,650+2%	11,469
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	16 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2560+11%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.94 TFLOPS+44%	6.221 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1746 MHz+29%	1350 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	160+11%	144
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P5200	Radeon Pro 5700
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P5200 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro 5700 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P5200 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5700. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5200) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P5200	Radeon Pro 5700
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5200) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	Quadro P5200	Radeon Pro 5700
DirectX	12.1	12.1
Vulkan	1.1	1.4+27%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700).

Feature	Quadro P5200	Radeon Pro 5700
Encoder	NVENC 5.0	VCN 2.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP7	VCN 2.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P5200 draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 130W — a 26.1% difference. The Quadro P5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5200) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Quadro P5200	Radeon Pro 5700
TDP	100W-23%	130W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	116.5+32%	88.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P5200 came in at $500, while the Radeon Pro 5700 launched at $799. On MSRP, Quadro P5200 was 37.4% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 23.3 (Quadro P5200) vs 14.4 (Radeon Pro 5700) — the Quadro P5200 offers 61.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 5700 (2020 vs 2018).

Feature	Quadro P5200	Radeon Pro 5700
MSRP	$500-37%	$799
Performance per Dollar	23.3+62%	14.4
Codename	GP104	Navi 10
Release	February 21 2018	August 4 2020
Ranking	#230	#238

Search Quadro P5200 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 5700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.