Quadro P5200 vs Radeon RX 7400
Quadro P5200
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P5200
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7400 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2018). The Radeon RX 7400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P5200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P5200.
| Insight | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $199 versus $240 for the Quadro P5200, it costs 17% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 20.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+20.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($240) | ✅More affordable ($199) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5200 and Radeon RX 7400
Quadro P5200
The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.
Radeon RX 7400
The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5200 scores 11,650 and the Radeon RX 7400 reaches 11,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 7400 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro P5200) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400). Raw compute: 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400). Boost clocks: 1746 MHz vs 2300 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,650 | 11,654 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.94 TFLOPS | 16.49 TFLOPS+84% |
| Boost Clock | 1746 MHz | 2300 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+43% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+88% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P5200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7400 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7400 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5200) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400).
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5200 draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 7400's 43W — a 79.7% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5200) vs 450W (Radeon RX 7400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 43W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 116.5 | 271.0+133% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P5200 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $240, while the Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199 and now averages $199. The Radeon RX 7400 costs 17.1% less ($41 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.5 (Quadro P5200) vs 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 20.8% better value. The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $199-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $240 | $199-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.5 | 58.6+21% |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | August 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #230 | #229 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P5200 and Radeon RX 7400
