Arc A580 vs Quadro P5200

CPU

GPU

Arc A580

2023Core: 1700 MHzBoost: 2000 MHz

Arc family

···

Buy on Amazon

Quadro P5200

2018Core: 1556 MHzBoost: 1746 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Arc A580 vs Quadro P5200 Performance Spectrum

Arc A580

8 GB 175

12,060

+3.5%

11,650

0.0%

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A580 vs Quadro P5200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A580 vs Quadro P5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A580

2023

Why buy it

✅29.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $321 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 189.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 67.4 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌75% higher power demand at 175W vs 100W.

Quadro P5200

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 175W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A580 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
179.3% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.3 vs 67.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A580 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 29.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.5% in PassMark G3D (12,060 vs 11,650), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A580 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 16nm, 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc A580 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $321 cheaper on MSRP at $179 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 189.2% (67.4 vs 23.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Arc A580 vs Quadro P5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A580

The Arc A580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 10 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,060 points.

Quadro P5200

The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A580 scores 12,060 and the Quadro P5200 reaches 11,650 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A580 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro P5200 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A580) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Arc A580) vs 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1746 MHz.

Feature	Arc A580	Quadro P5200
G3D Mark Score	12,060+4%	11,650
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Pascal
Process Node	6 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	3072+20%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.29 TFLOPS+37%	8.94 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2000 MHz+15%	1746 MHz
ROPs	96+50%	64
TMUs	192+20%	160
L2 Cache	8 MB+300%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A580	Quadro P5200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A580 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 carries 4 GB. Arc A580 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A580 and 256-bit on the Quadro P5200. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc A580) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5200) — the Arc A580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A580	Quadro P5200
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	8 MB+300%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A580) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A580	Quadro P5200
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A580) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A580) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200).

Feature	Arc A580	Quadro P5200
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	NVENC 5.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	PureVideo HD VP7
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A580 draws 175W versus the Quadro P5200's 100W — a 54.5% difference. The Quadro P5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc A580) vs 500W (Quadro P5200). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 271mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 85°C.

Feature	Arc A580	Quadro P5200
TDP	175W	100W-43%
Recommended PSU	600W	500W-17%
Power Connector	2x 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	271mm	0mm
Height	132mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	68.9	116.5+69%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A580 came in at $179, while the Quadro P5200 launched at $500. On MSRP, Arc A580 was 64.2% cheaper ($321 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 67.4 (Arc A580) vs 23.3 (Quadro P5200) — the Arc A580 offers 189.3% better value. The newer card here is Arc A580 (2023 vs 2018).

Feature	Arc A580	Quadro P5200
MSRP	$179-64%	$500
Performance per Dollar	67.4+189%	23.3
Codename	DG2-512	GP104
Release	October 10 2023	February 21 2018
Ranking	#223	#230

Search Arc A580 on Amazon

Search Quadro P5200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.