Arc A580 vs RTX A4000H

Intel

Arc A580

2023Core: 1700 MHzBoost: 2000 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

RTX A4000H

2021Core: 735 MHzBoost: 1560 MHz

Arc A580 vs RTX A4000H Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A580 vs RTX A4000H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A580 vs RTX A4000H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A580

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $821 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 470.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 67.4 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RTX A4000H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 25% higher power demand at 175W vs 140W.
  • 12.4% longer card at 271mm vs 241mm.

RTX A4000H

2021

Why buy it

  • 14.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 140W instead of 175W, a 35W reduction.
  • Measures 241mm instead of 271mm, a 30mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Arc A580 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 458.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,000 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 67.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RTX A4000H is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Arc A580 instead at 12,060 vs 11,815, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A580 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 8nm and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A580 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $821 cheaper on MSRP at $179 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 470.2% (67.4 vs 11.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. RTX A4000H still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Arc A580 vs RTX A4000H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A580

The Arc A580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 10 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,060 points.

NVIDIA

RTX A4000H

The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A580 scores 12,060 and the RTX A4000H reaches 11,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A580 is built on Generation 12.7 while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A580) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Arc A580) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (Arc A580) vs 48 (RTX A4000H) with 384 Tensor cores vs 192.

FeatureArc A580RTX A4000H
G3D Mark Score
12,060+2%
11,815
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Ampere
Process Node
6 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
3072
6144+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
12.29 TFLOPS
19.17 TFLOPS+56%
Boost Clock
2000 MHz+28%
1560 MHz
ROPs
96
96
TMUs
192
192
L2 Cache
8 MB+100%
4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
24
48+100%
Tensor Cores
384+100%
192

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A4000H gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A580 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureArc A580RTX A4000H
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A580) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) — a 14.3% advantage for the Arc A580. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A580 and 192-bit on the RTX A4000H. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc A580) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000H) — the Arc A580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A580RTX A4000H
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s+14%
448 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+33%
192-bit
L2 Cache
8 MB+100%
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A580) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureArc A580RTX A4000H
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A580) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs None. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A580) vs None (RTX A4000H).

FeatureArc A580RTX A4000H
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
None
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
None
Codecs
AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9
None
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A580 draws 175W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 22.2% difference. The RTX A4000H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc A580) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 271mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 75°C.

FeatureArc A580RTX A4000H
TDP
175W
140W-20%
Recommended PSU
600W
500W-17%
Power Connector
2x 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
271mm
241mm
Height
132mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70-7%
75°C
Perf/Watt
68.9
84.4+22%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A580 came in at $179, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000. On MSRP, Arc A580 was 82.1% cheaper ($821 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 67.4 (Arc A580) vs 11.8 (RTX A4000H) — the Arc A580 offers 471.2% better value. The newer card here is Arc A580 (2023 vs 2021).

FeatureArc A580RTX A4000H
MSRP
$179-82%
$1000
Performance per Dollar
67.4+471%
11.8
Codename
DG2-512
GA104
Release
October 10 2023
April 12 2021
Ranking
#223
#226

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.