
Arc A580

RTX A4000H
Arc A580 vs RTX A4000H Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A580 vs RTX A4000H FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A580 vs RTX A4000H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A580
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $821 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 470.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 67.4 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 175W vs 140W.
- ❌12.4% longer card at 271mm vs 241mm.
RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅14.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 175W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 271mm, a 30mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Arc A580 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌458.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 67.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A580 vs RTX A4000H Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A580
The Arc A580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 10 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,060 points.

RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A580 scores 12,060 and the RTX A4000H reaches 11,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A580 is built on Generation 12.7 while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A580) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Arc A580) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (Arc A580) vs 48 (RTX A4000H) with 384 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | Arc A580 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,060+2% | 11,815 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 6144+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+56% |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+28% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 192 | 192 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 48+100% |
| Tensor Cores | 384+100% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4000H gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A580 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc A580 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A580) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) — a 14.3% advantage for the Arc A580. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A580 and 192-bit on the RTX A4000H. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc A580) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000H) — the Arc A580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A580 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+14% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A580) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A580 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A580) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs None. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A580) vs None (RTX A4000H).
| Feature | Arc A580 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | None |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | None |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | None |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A580 draws 175W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 22.2% difference. The RTX A4000H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc A580) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 271mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc A580 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 140W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 271mm | 241mm |
| Height | 132mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 68.9 | 84.4+22% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc A580 came in at $179, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000. On MSRP, Arc A580 was 82.1% cheaper ($821 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 67.4 (Arc A580) vs 11.8 (RTX A4000H) — the Arc A580 offers 471.2% better value. The newer card here is Arc A580 (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | Arc A580 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179-82% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.4+471% | 11.8 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | GA104 |
| Release | October 10 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #223 | #226 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















