Arc A580 vs Radeon Pro WX 9100

Intel

Arc A580

2023Core: 1700 MHzBoost: 2000 MHz
Arc family
···
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 9100

2017Core: 1200 MHzBoost: 1500 MHz

Arc A580 vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A580 vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A580 vs Radeon Pro WX 9100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A580

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,020 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1109.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 67.4 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 175W instead of 230W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 9100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro WX 9100

2017

Why buy it

  • 1.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 1128.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,199 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 67.4 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
  • 31.4% higher power demand at 230W vs 175W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro WX 9100 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (12,250 vs 12,060), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A580 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 14nm, 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A580 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,020 cheaper on MSRP at $179 vs $2,199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1109.4% (67.4 vs 5.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Pro WX 9100 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Arc A580 vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A580

The Arc A580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 10 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,060 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 9100

The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,250 points. Launch price was $1,599.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A580 scores 12,060 and the Radeon Pro WX 9100 reaches 12,250 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A580 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 uses GCN 5.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A580) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Arc A580) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

FeatureArc A580Radeon Pro WX 9100
G3D Mark Score
12,060
12,250+2%
Architecture
Generation 12.7
GCN 5.0
Process Node
6 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
3072
4096+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
12.29 TFLOPS
12.29 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2000 MHz+33%
1500 MHz
ROPs
96+50%
64
TMUs
192
256+33%
L2 Cache
8 MB+100%
4 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc A580Radeon Pro WX 9100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A580 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 carries 16 GB. Radeon Pro WX 9100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A580 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 9100. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc A580) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 9100) — the Arc A580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A580Radeon Pro WX 9100
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
8 MB+100%
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A580) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureArc A580Radeon Pro WX 9100
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A580) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A580) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 9100).

FeatureArc A580Radeon Pro WX 9100
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
VCE 4.0
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
UVD 7.0
Codecs
AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A580 draws 175W versus the Radeon Pro WX 9100's 230W — a 27.2% difference. The Arc A580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc A580) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 271mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 85°C.

FeatureArc A580Radeon Pro WX 9100
TDP
175W-24%
230W
Recommended PSU
600W
500W-17%
Power Connector
2x 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
271mm
267mm
Height
132mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70-18%
85°C
Perf/Watt
68.9+29%
53.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A580 came in at $179, while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 launched at $2199. On MSRP, Arc A580 was 91.9% cheaper ($2020 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 67.4 (Arc A580) vs 5.6 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) — the Arc A580 offers 1103.6% better value. The newer card here is Arc A580 (2023 vs 2017).

FeatureArc A580Radeon Pro WX 9100
MSRP
$179-92%
$2199
Performance per Dollar
67.4+1104%
5.6
Codename
DG2-512
Vega 10
Release
October 10 2023
July 10 2017
Ranking
#223
#219

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.