Arc A580
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
Arc A580 vs Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A580 vs Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A580 vs Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A580
2023Why buy it
- ✅5.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 67.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌118.8% higher power demand at 175W vs 80W.
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 175W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A580 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Arc A580 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 67.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A580 vs Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc A580
The Arc A580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 10 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,060 points.
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,173 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A580 scores 12,060 and the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design reaches 12,173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A580 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A580) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Arc A580) vs 7.066 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1380 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (Arc A580) vs 40 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) with 384 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | Arc A580 | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,060 | 12,173 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Turing |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+20% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS+74% | 7.066 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+45% | 1380 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+20% | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 40+67% |
| Tensor Cores | 384+20% | 320 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Arc A580 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A580 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc A580 | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A580 and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc A580) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) — the Arc A580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A580 | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A580) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A580 | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A580) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A580) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | Arc A580 | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A580 draws 175W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 74.5% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc A580) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 271mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc A580 | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 80W-54% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 271mm | 0mm |
| Height | 132mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 68.9 | 152.2+121% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Arc A580 (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Arc A580 | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179 | — |
| Codename | DG2-512 | TU104 |
| Release | October 10 2023 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #223 | #220 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A580 and Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
