
Arc A580

Radeon Pro Vega 56
Arc A580 vs Radeon Pro Vega 56 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A580 vs Radeon Pro Vega 56 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A580 vs Radeon Pro Vega 56: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A580
2023Why buy it
- ✅35.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 122.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 67.4 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A580 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌122.9% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.3 vs 67.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A580 vs Radeon Pro Vega 56 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A580
The Arc A580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 10 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,060 points.

Radeon Pro Vega 56
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A580 scores 12,060 and the Radeon Pro Vega 56 reaches 12,104 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A580 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A580) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Arc A580) vs 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A580 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,060 | 12,104 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3584+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS+37% | 8.96 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+60% | 1250 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192 | 224+17% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A580 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A580 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 carries 0 MB. Arc A580 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A580 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 56. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc A580) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 56) — the Arc A580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A580 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A580) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A580 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A580) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A580) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56).
| Feature | Arc A580 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A580 draws 175W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 56's 210W — a 18.2% difference. The Arc A580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc A580) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 271mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Arc A580 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W-17% | 210W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 271mm | 267mm |
| Height | 132mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 68.9+20% | 57.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc A580 came in at $179, while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 launched at $399. On MSRP, Arc A580 was 55.1% cheaper ($220 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 67.4 (Arc A580) vs 30.3 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) — the Arc A580 offers 122.4% better value. The newer card here is Arc A580 (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | Arc A580 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179-55% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.4+122% | 30.3 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | Vega 10 |
| Release | October 10 2023 | August 14 2017 |
| Ranking | #223 | #222 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















