G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A580 vs Intel Arc Pro B50 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A580 vs Intel Arc Pro B50: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A580

2023

Why buy it

✅32.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Delivers 92.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 67.4 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Intel Arc Pro B50 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌150% higher power demand at 175W vs 70W.
❌62.3% longer card at 271mm vs 167mm.

Intel Arc Pro B50

2025

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 175W, a 105W reduction.
✅Measures 167mm instead of 271mm, a 104mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A580 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌
95% HIGHER MSRP
$349 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.0 vs 67.4 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A580 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 32.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Intel Arc Pro B50 instead at 12,208 vs 12,060, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Intel Arc Pro B50 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 6nm and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2023. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc A580 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $170 cheaper on MSRP at $179 vs $349, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 92.6% (67.4 vs 35.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, Arc A580 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Intel Arc Pro B50 has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A580 vs Intel Arc Pro B50 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A580

The Arc A580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 10 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,060 points.

Intel Arc Pro B50

The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A580 scores 12,060 and the Intel Arc Pro B50 reaches 12,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A580 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Intel Arc Pro B50 uses Xe2, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A580) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Arc A580) vs 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (Arc A580) vs 16 (Intel Arc Pro B50) with 384 Tensor cores.

Feature	Arc A580	Intel Arc Pro B50
G3D Mark Score	12,060	12,208+1%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Xe2
Process Node	6 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	3072+50%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.29 TFLOPS+15%	10.65 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2000 MHz	2600 MHz+30%
ROPs	96+500%	16
TMUs	192+50%	128
L2 Cache	8 MB+100%	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	24+50%	16

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A580	Intel Arc Pro B50
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A580 and 128-bit on the Intel Arc Pro B50. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc A580) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the Arc A580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A580	Intel Arc Pro B50
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	8 MB+100%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A580) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A580	Intel Arc Pro B50
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A580) vs Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs Dual Arc Media Engine. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A580) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50).

Feature	Arc A580	Intel Arc Pro B50
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	Dual Arc Media Engine
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	Dual Arc Media Engine
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A580 draws 175W versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 70W — a 85.7% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc A580) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 271mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 75°C.

Feature	Arc A580	Intel Arc Pro B50
TDP	175W	70W-60%
Recommended PSU	600W	500W-17%
Power Connector	2x 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	271mm	167mm
Height	132mm	69mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	68.9	174.4+153%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A580 came in at $179, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 launched at $349. On MSRP, Arc A580 was 48.7% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 67.4 (Arc A580) vs 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the Arc A580 offers 92.6% better value. The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro B50 (2025 vs 2023).

Feature	Arc A580	Intel Arc Pro B50
MSRP	$179-49%	$349
Performance per Dollar	67.4+93%	35.0
Codename	DG2-512	BMG-G21
Release	October 10 2023	September 5 2025
Ranking	#223	#221

Search Arc A580 on Amazon

Search Intel Arc Pro B50 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.