Arc A770M vs Quadro P5200

Arc A770M vs Quadro P5200 Performance Spectrum

Arc A770M

16 GB 120

11,853

+1.7%

11,650

0.0%

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A770M vs Quadro P5200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A770M vs Quadro P5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A770M

2022

Why buy it

✅75.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌20% higher power demand at 120W vs 100W.

Quadro P5200

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 120W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A770M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 75.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (11,853 vs 11,650), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A770M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 16 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 16nm, 32 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2018. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P5200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro P5200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A770M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A770M vs Quadro P5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A770M

The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

Quadro P5200

The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770M scores 11,853 and the Quadro P5200 reaches 11,650 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro P5200 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1746 MHz.

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro P5200
G3D Mark Score	11,853+2%	11,650
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Pascal
Process Node	6 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	4096+60%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.79 TFLOPS+88%	8.94 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2050 MHz+17%	1746 MHz
ROPs	128+100%	64
TMUs	256+60%	160
L1 Cache	6 MB+538%	0.94 MB
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro P5200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770M has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 carries 4 GB. Arc A770M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A770M and 256-bit on the Quadro P5200. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5200) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro P5200
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro P5200
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200).

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro P5200
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	NVENC 5.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	PureVideo HD VP7
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the Quadro P5200's 100W — a 18.2% difference. The Quadro P5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 500W (Quadro P5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro P5200
TDP	120W	100W-17%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	98.8	116.5+18%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A770M (2022 vs 2018).

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro P5200
MSRP	—	$500
Codename	DG2-512	GP104
Release	2022	February 21 2018
Ranking	#225	#230

Search Arc A770M on Amazon

Search Quadro P5200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.