G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M6000 24GB vs Quadro P5200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M6000 24GB vs Quadro P5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016

Why buy it

✅27.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 24 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
899.8% HIGHER MSRP
$4,999 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.

Quadro P5200

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,499 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 902% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Quadro M6000 24GB is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro P5200 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 24GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro M6000 24GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 27.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P5200 instead at 11,650 vs 11,625, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P5200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P5200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4,499 cheaper on MSRP at $500 vs $4,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 902% (23.3 vs 2.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro M6000 24GB still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro M6000 24GB vs Quadro P5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M6000 24GB

The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.

Quadro P5200

The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M6000 24GB scores 11,625 and the Quadro P5200 reaches 11,650 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M6000 24GB is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro P5200 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 1746 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	Quadro P5200
G3D Mark Score	11,625	11,650
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	3072+20%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.844 TFLOPS	8.94 TFLOPS+31%
Boost Clock	1114 MHz	1746 MHz+57%
ROPs	96+50%	64
TMUs	256+60%	160
L1 Cache	1.1 MB+17%	0.94 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+50%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	Quadro P5200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M6000 24GB has 24 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 carries 4 GB. Quadro M6000 24GB gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro M6000 24GB and 256-bit on the Quadro P5200. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5200) — the Quadro M6000 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	Quadro P5200
VRAM Capacity	24 GB+500%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	384-bit+50%	256-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+50%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	Quadro P5200
DirectX	12/1	12.1
Vulkan	1.1	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200).

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	Quadro P5200
Encoder	NVENC 4.0	NVENC 5.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP6	PureVideo HD VP7
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M6000 24GB draws 250W versus the Quadro P5200's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 500W (Quadro P5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	Quadro P5200
TDP	250W	100W-60%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	46.5	116.5+151%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro M6000 24GB came in at $4999, while the Quadro P5200 launched at $500. On MSRP, Quadro P5200 was 90% cheaper ($4499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.3 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 23.3 (Quadro P5200) — the Quadro P5200 offers 913% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P5200 (2018 vs 2016).

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	Quadro P5200
MSRP	$4999	$500-90%
Performance per Dollar	2.3	23.3+913%
Codename	GM200	GP104
Release	March 5 2016	February 21 2018
Ranking	#233	#230

Search Quadro M6000 24GB on Amazon

Search Quadro P5200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.