
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design

Quadro M6000 24GB
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro M6000 24GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro M6000 24GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro M6000 24GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 250W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 24GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
Quadro M6000 24GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅7.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2016 hardware with 24 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌212.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro M6000 24GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 885 MHz to 1185 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,461 points.

Quadro M6000 24GB
The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design scores 11,461 and the Quadro M6000 24GB reaches 11,625 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Quadro M6000 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Raw compute: 5.46 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB). Boost clocks: 1185 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,461 | 11,625+1% |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3072+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.46 TFLOPS | 6.844 TFLOPS+25% |
| Boost Clock | 1185 MHz+6% | 1114 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 144 | 256+78% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+109% | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M6000 24GB leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 24GB carries 24 GB. Quadro M6000 24GB gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 384 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000 24GB) — a 21.1% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design and 384-bit on the Quadro M6000 24GB. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 384 GB/s+21% | 317 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12/1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 250W — a 103% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-68% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 143.3+208% | 46.5 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $4999 |
| Codename | TU106B | GM200 |
| Release | January 29 2019 | March 5 2016 |
| Ranking | #237 | #233 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














