GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design

2019Core: 885 MHzBoost: 1185 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

2021Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1410 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

  • 47.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 100% higher power demand at 80W vs 40W.

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

2021

Why buy it

  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 40W instead of 80W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 47.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) instead at 11,715 vs 11,461, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is limited to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and no comparable frame-generation support and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2019. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 885 MHz to 1185 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,461 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1410 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,715 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design scores 11,461 and the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) reaches 11,715 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 896 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 5.46 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 2.527 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 1185 MHz vs 1410 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignQuadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
G3D Mark Score
11,461
11,715+2%
Architecture
Turing
Turing
Process Node
12 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2304+157%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.46 TFLOPS+116%
2.527 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1185 MHz
1410 MHz+19%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
144+157%
56
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+161%
0.88 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignQuadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile). L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 1 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) — the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignQuadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignQuadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)).

FeatureGeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignQuadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
Encoder
7th Gen NVENC
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)'s 40W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignQuadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
TDP
80W
40W-50%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
85°C
Perf/Watt
143.3
292.9+104%