
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Instinct MI60

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Radeon Instinct MI60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Instinct MI60
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Instinct MI60 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Instinct MI60 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design and Radeon Instinct MI60

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 885 MHz to 1185 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,461 points.

Radeon Instinct MI60
The Radeon Instinct MI60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2018. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,638 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design scores 11,461 and the Radeon Instinct MI60 reaches 11,638 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon Instinct MI60 uses GCN 5.1, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Raw compute: 5.46 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 14.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Instinct MI60). Boost clocks: 1185 MHz vs 1800 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,461 | 11,638+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4096+78% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.46 TFLOPS | 14.75 TFLOPS+170% |
| Boost Clock | 1185 MHz | 1800 MHz+52% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 256+78% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+130% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Instinct MI60 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Instinct MI60).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon Instinct MI60's 300W — a 115.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon Instinct MI60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-73% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 143.3+269% | 38.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $6000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $600 |
| Codename | TU106B | Vega 20 |
| Release | January 29 2019 | November 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #237 | #232 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















