Quadro M6000 24GB vs Radeon RX 7400

NVIDIA

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016Core: 988 MHzBoost: 1114 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 7400

2025Core: 1452 MHzBoost: 2300 MHz
RX family
·······

Quadro M6000 24GB vs Radeon RX 7400 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M6000 24GB vs Radeon RX 7400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M6000 24GB vs Radeon RX 7400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016

Why buy it

  • 1.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • 2016 hardware with 24 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 2412.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $4,999 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 58.6 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • 481.4% higher power demand at 250W vs 43W.

Radeon RX 7400

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $4,800 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 2418.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 43W instead of 250W, a 207W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 24GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro M6000 24GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX 7400 instead at 11,654 vs 11,625, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 7400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Quadro M6000 24GB is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 7400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4,800 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $4,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2418.3% (58.6 vs 2.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro M6000 24GB still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro M6000 24GB vs Radeon RX 7400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro M6000 24GB

The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.

AMD

Radeon RX 7400

The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M6000 24GB scores 11,625 and the Radeon RX 7400 reaches 11,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M6000 24GB is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 7400 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 2300 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBRadeon RX 7400
G3D Mark Score
11,625
11,654
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
3072+71%
1792
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.844 TFLOPS
16.49 TFLOPS+141%
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
2300 MHz+106%
ROPs
96+50%
64
TMUs
256+129%
112
L1 Cache
1.1 MB+120%
0.5 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB+50%
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro M6000 24GB does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBRadeon RX 7400
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M6000 24GB has 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7400 carries 8 GB. Quadro M6000 24GB gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 7400) — a 147.7% advantage for the Quadro M6000 24GB. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro M6000 24GB and 64-bit on the Radeon RX 7400. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7400) — the Quadro M6000 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBRadeon RX 7400
VRAM Capacity
24 GB+200%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
317 GB/s+148%
128 GB/s
Bus Width
384-bit+500%
64-bit
L2 Cache
3 MB+50%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBRadeon RX 7400
DirectX
12/1
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400).

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBRadeon RX 7400
Encoder
NVENC 4.0
VCN 4.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M6000 24GB draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 7400's 43W — a 141.3% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 450W (Radeon RX 7400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBRadeon RX 7400
TDP
250W
43W-83%
Recommended PSU
500W
450W-10%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
267mm
241mm
Height
112mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
46.5
271.0+483%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro M6000 24GB came in at $4999, while the Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon RX 7400 was 96% cheaper ($4800 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.3 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 2447.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 7400 (2025 vs 2016).

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBRadeon RX 7400
MSRP
$4999
$199-96%
Performance per Dollar
2.3
58.6+2448%
Codename
GM200
Navi 33
Release
March 5 2016
August 8 2025
Ranking
#233
#229

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.