Quadro M6000 24GB
Radeon RX 5600
Quadro M6000 24GB vs Radeon RX 5600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M6000 24GB vs Radeon RX 5600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro M6000 24GB vs Radeon RX 5600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M6000 24GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅43.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2016 hardware with 24 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌2083% HIGHER MSRP$4,999 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 51.3 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
Radeon RX 5600
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,770 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2107% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.3 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 24GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M6000 24GB vs Radeon RX 5600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro M6000 24GB
The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Radeon RX 5600
The Radeon RX 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1265 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,753 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M6000 24GB scores 11,625 and the Radeon RX 5600 reaches 11,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M6000 24GB is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 5600 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 5.829 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 1265 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,625 | 11,753+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+33% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.844 TFLOPS+17% | 5.829 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1114 MHz | 1265 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+78% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5600 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro M6000 24GB does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M6000 24GB has 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600 carries 6 GB. Quadro M6000 24GB gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 5600) — a 10.1% advantage for the Quadro M6000 24GB. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro M6000 24GB and 192-bit on the Radeon RX 5600.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+300% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 317 GB/s+10% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12/1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M6000 24GB draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 5600's 150W — a 50% difference. The Radeon RX 5600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 150W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 46.5 | 78.4+69% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro M6000 24GB came in at $4999, while the Radeon RX 5600 launched at $229. On MSRP, Radeon RX 5600 was 95.4% cheaper ($4770 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.3 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 51.3 (Radeon RX 5600) — the Radeon RX 5600 offers 2130.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 5600 (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4999 | $229-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.3 | 51.3+2130% |
| Codename | GM200 | Navi 10 |
| Release | March 5 2016 | July 7 2020 |
| Ranking | #233 | #295 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M6000 24GB and Radeon RX 5600
