Quadro M6000 vs Quadro M6000 24GB

NVIDIA

Quadro M6000

2015Core: 988 MHzBoost: 1114 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016Core: 988 MHzBoost: 1114 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro M6000 vs Quadro M6000 24GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M6000 vs Quadro M6000 24GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M6000 vs Quadro M6000 24GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M6000

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 24GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016

Why buy it

  • 10.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
  • More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 24 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro M6000 24GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro M6000 instead at 11,769 vs 11,625, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro M6000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M6000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $4,999 vs $4,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1.2% (2.4 vs 2.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro M6000 24GB still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro M6000 vs Quadro M6000 24GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro M6000

The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.

NVIDIA

Quadro M6000 24GB

The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M6000 scores 11,769 and the Quadro M6000 24GB reaches 11,625 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M6000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro M6000 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 1114 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M6000Quadro M6000 24GB
G3D Mark Score
11,769+1%
11,625
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
3072
3072
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.844 TFLOPS
6.844 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
1114 MHz
ROPs
96
96
TMUs
192
256+33%
L1 Cache
1.1 MB
1.1 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
3 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M6000Quadro M6000 24GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M6000 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 24GB carries 24 GB. Quadro M6000 24GB gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro M6000 and 384-bit on the Quadro M6000 24GB.

FeatureQuadro M6000Quadro M6000 24GB
VRAM Capacity
12 GB
24 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
317 GB/s
317 GB/s
Bus Width
384-bit
384-bit
L2 Cache
3 MB
3 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro M6000Quadro M6000 24GB
DirectX
12/1
12/1
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB).

FeatureQuadro M6000Quadro M6000 24GB
Encoder
NVENC 4.0
NVENC 4.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M6000 draws 250W versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 250W — a 0% difference. The Quadro M6000 24GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000) vs 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureQuadro M6000Quadro M6000 24GB
TDP
250W
250W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
112mm
112mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
47.1+1%
46.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro M6000 came in at $4999, while the Quadro M6000 24GB launched at $4999. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (Quadro M6000) vs 2.3 (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the Quadro M6000 offers 4.3% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M6000 24GB (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureQuadro M6000Quadro M6000 24GB
MSRP
$4999
$4999
Performance per Dollar
2.4+4%
2.3
Codename
GM200
GM200
Release
March 21 2015
March 5 2016
Ranking
#228
#233

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.