Quadro M6000
RTX A4000H
Quadro M6000 vs RTX A4000H Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M6000 vs RTX A4000H FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro M6000 vs RTX A4000H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M6000
2015Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌399.9% HIGHER MSRP$4,999 MSRPvs$1,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ❌78.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 140W.
RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅28.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $3,999 less on MSRP ($1,000 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 401.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 250W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M6000 vs RTX A4000H Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro M6000
The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M6000 scores 11,769 and the RTX A4000H reaches 11,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M6000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,769 | 11,815 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 6144+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.844 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+180% |
| Boost Clock | 1114 MHz | 1560 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 192 | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 6 MB+445% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4000H gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M6000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M6000 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000H carries 8 GB. Quadro M6000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) — a 41.3% advantage for the RTX A4000H. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro M6000 and 192-bit on the RTX A4000H. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro M6000) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000H) — the RTX A4000H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 317 GB/s | 448 GB/s+41% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12/1 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000) vs None (RTX A4000H).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | None |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M6000 draws 250W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 56.4% difference. The RTX A4000H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 140W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.1 | 84.4+79% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro M6000 came in at $4999, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000. On MSRP, RTX A4000H was 80% cheaper ($3999 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (Quadro M6000) vs 11.8 (RTX A4000H) — the RTX A4000H offers 391.7% better value. The newer card here is RTX A4000H (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4999 | $1000-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.4 | 11.8+392% |
| Codename | GM200 | GA104 |
| Release | March 21 2015 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #228 | #226 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M6000 and RTX A4000H
