Quadro M6000 vs Tesla P40
Quadro M6000
Popular choices:
Tesla P40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M6000
Performance Per Dollar Tesla P40
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla P40 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (24 GB vs 12 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M6000.
| Insight | Quadro M6000 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla P40 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla P40 holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $500), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 234.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M6000 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+234.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M6000 and Tesla P40
Quadro M6000
The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.
Tesla P40
The Tesla P40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,808 points. Launch price was $5,699.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M6000 scores 11,769 and the Tesla P40 reaches 11,808 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M6000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla P40 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000) vs 3,840 (Tesla P40). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000) vs 11.76 TFLOPS (Tesla P40). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,769 | 11,808 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3840+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.844 TFLOPS | 11.76 TFLOPS+72% |
| Boost Clock | 1114 MHz | 1531 MHz+37% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 192 | 240+25% |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 1.4 MB+27% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M6000 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla P40 has 24 GB. The Tesla P40 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 24 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000) vs 12.1 (Tesla P40). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12/1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla P40). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla P40).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M6000 draws 250W versus the Tesla P40's 250W — a 0% difference. The Tesla P40 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000) vs 500W (Tesla P40). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 47.1 | 47.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M6000 launched at $4999 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Tesla P40 launched at $5699 and now averages $150. The Tesla P40 costs 70% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.5 (Quadro M6000) vs 78.7 (Tesla P40) — the Tesla P40 offers 234.9% better value. The Tesla P40 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4999-12% | $5699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $150-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.5 | 78.7+235% |
| Codename | GM200 | GP102 |
| Release | March 21 2015 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #228 | #227 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M6000 and Tesla P40
