G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs Quadro M6000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs Quadro M6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1928.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quadro M6000

2015

Why buy it

✅3.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2015 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
1907.6% HIGHER MSRP
$4,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro M6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce RTX 3050 OEM instead at 11,892 vs 11,769, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 20 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4,750 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $4,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1928.6% (47.8 vs 2.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro M6000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs Quadro M6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Quadro M6000

The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 and the Quadro M6000 reaches 11,769 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Quadro M6000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1114 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro M6000
G3D Mark Score	11,892+1%	11,769
Architecture	Ampere	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2560	3072+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS+31%	6.844 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1755 MHz+58%	1114 MHz
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	80	192+140%
L1 Cache	2.5 MB+127%	1.1 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M6000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro M6000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 carries 12 GB. Quadro M6000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000) — a 41.5% advantage for the Quadro M6000. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and 384-bit on the Quadro M6000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000) — the Quadro M6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro M6000
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	12 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	224 GB/s	317 GB/s+42%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro M6000
DirectX	12.2+2%	12/1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro M6000
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	NVENC 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Quadro M6000's 250W — a 63.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Quadro M6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro M6000
TDP	130W-48%	250W
Recommended PSU	450W-10%	500W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	235mm	267mm
Height	124mm	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	91.5+94%	47.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM came in at $249, while the Quadro M6000 launched at $4999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 OEM was 95% cheaper ($4750 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2.4 (Quadro M6000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 1891.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (2022 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Quadro M6000
MSRP	$249-95%	$4999
Performance per Dollar	47.8+1892%	2.4
Codename	GA106	GM200
Release	January 4 2022	March 21 2015
Ranking	#224	#228

Search GeForce RTX 3050 OEM on Amazon

Search Quadro M6000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.