
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

RTX A4000H
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs RTX A4000H Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs RTX A4000H FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs RTX A4000H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 304.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 241mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 192), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅32.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅140% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (192 vs 80).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌301.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs RTX A4000H Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 and the RTX A4000H reaches 11,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 48 (RTX A4000H) with 80 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 11,815 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 6144+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+113% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+13% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 192+140% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 6 MB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 48+140% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 192+140% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4000H supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) — a 100% advantage for the RTX A4000H. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and 192-bit on the RTX A4000H. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000H) — the RTX A4000H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 448 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs None (RTX A4000H).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | None |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | None |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 7.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-7% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 241mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+8% | 84.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM came in at $249, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 OEM was 75.1% cheaper ($751 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 11.8 (RTX A4000H) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 305.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-75% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+305% | 11.8 |
| Codename | GA106 | GA104 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #224 | #226 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















