GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Radeon PRO V710
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs Radeon PRO V710 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs Radeon PRO V710 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs Radeon PRO V710: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 696% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 158W, a 28W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO V710 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Radeon PRO V710 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
Radeon PRO V710
2024Why buy it
- ✅34.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌703.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌21.5% higher power demand at 158W vs 130W.
- ❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs Radeon PRO V710 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Radeon PRO V710
The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 and the Radeon PRO V710 reaches 12,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 54 (Radeon PRO V710) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 12,000 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3456+35% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 27.65 TFLOPS+208% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2000 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 216+170% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+233% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 54+170% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO V710 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO V710.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon PRO V710's 158W — a 19.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-18% | 158W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 267mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+21% | 75.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM came in at $249, while the Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 OEM was 87.5% cheaper ($1751 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 696.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO V710 (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-88% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+697% | 6.0 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 32 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | October 3 2024 |
| Ranking | #224 | #196 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon PRO V710
