GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs Intel Arc Pro B50
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Intel Arc Pro B50
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro B50
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $349 for the Intel Arc Pro B50, it costs 57% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 126.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+126.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($349) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Intel Arc Pro B50
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 and the Intel Arc Pro B50 reaches 12,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Intel Arc Pro B50 uses Xe2, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 16 (Intel Arc Pro B50) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 12,208+3% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 10.65 TFLOPS+19% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2600 MHz+48% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro B50 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Dual Arc Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 70W — a 60% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 70W-46% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 167mm |
| Height | 124mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 174.4+91% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 launched at $349 and now averages $349. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 57% less ($199 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 126.6% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-29% | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-57% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 79.3+127% | 35.0 |
| Codename | GA106 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #224 | #221 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Intel Arc Pro B50
