Quadro M6000
Radeon PRO V710
Quadro M6000 vs Radeon PRO V710 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M6000 vs Radeon PRO V710 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro M6000 vs Radeon PRO V710: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M6000
2015Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO V710 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌150% HIGHER MSRP$4,999 MSRPvs$2,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ❌58.2% higher power demand at 250W vs 158W.
Radeon PRO V710
2024Why buy it
- ✅30.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,999 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 154.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 158W instead of 250W, a 92W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M6000 vs Radeon PRO V710 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro M6000
The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.
Radeon PRO V710
The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M6000 scores 11,769 and the Radeon PRO V710 reaches 12,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M6000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000) vs 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000) vs 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 2000 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,769 | 12,000+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3456+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.844 TFLOPS | 27.65 TFLOPS+304% |
| Boost Clock | 1114 MHz | 2000 MHz+80% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 192 | 216+13% |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB+47% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M6000 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO V710 carries 8 GB. Quadro M6000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro M6000 and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO V710. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro M6000) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) — the Quadro M6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12/1 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M6000 draws 250W versus the Radeon PRO V710's 158W — a 45.1% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 158W-37% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 47.1 | 75.9+61% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro M6000 came in at $4999, while the Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000. On MSRP, Radeon PRO V710 was 60% cheaper ($2999 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (Quadro M6000) vs 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) — the Radeon PRO V710 offers 150% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO V710 (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4999 | $2000-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.4 | 6.0+150% |
| Codename | GM200 | Navi 32 |
| Release | March 21 2015 | October 3 2024 |
| Ranking | #228 | #196 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M6000 and Radeon PRO V710
