Intel Arc Pro B50
Quadro M6000
Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Quadro M6000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Quadro M6000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Quadro M6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,650 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1385.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro M6000
2015Why buy it
- ✅18.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌1332.4% HIGHER MSRP$4,999 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
- ❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Quadro M6000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.
Quadro M6000
The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro B50 scores 12,208 and the Quadro M6000 reaches 11,769 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is built on Xe2 while the Quadro M6000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000). Raw compute: 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,208+4% | 11,769 |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3072+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.65 TFLOPS+56% | 6.844 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+133% | 1114 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 96+500% |
| TMUs | 128 | 192+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Arc Pro B50 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 carries 12 GB. Quadro M6000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Intel Arc Pro B50 and 384-bit on the Quadro M6000. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12/1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000). Decoder: Dual Arc Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Arc Media Engine | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | Dual Arc Media Engine | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro B50 draws 70W versus the Quadro M6000's 250W — a 112.5% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 500W (Quadro M6000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-72% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | 267mm |
| Height | 69mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 174.4+270% | 47.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Intel Arc Pro B50 came in at $349, while the Quadro M6000 launched at $4999. On MSRP, Intel Arc Pro B50 was 93% cheaper ($4650 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 2.4 (Quadro M6000) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 offers 1358.3% better value. The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro B50 (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-93% | $4999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.0+1358% | 2.4 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | GM200 |
| Release | September 5 2025 | March 21 2015 |
| Ranking | #221 | #228 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Arc Pro B50 and Quadro M6000
