Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Radeon Pro Vega 56

Intel

Intel Arc Pro B50

2025Core: 1700 MHzBoost: 2600 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 56

2017Core: 1138 MHzBoost: 1250 MHz

Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Radeon Pro Vega 56 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Radeon Pro Vega 56 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Radeon Pro Vega 56: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel Arc Pro B50

2025

Why buy it

  • 1.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 15.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
  • Better long-term bet: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon Pro Vega 56

2017

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Intel Arc Pro B50 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 14.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $399 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.3 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Intel Arc Pro B50 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (12,208 vs 12,104), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Intel Arc Pro B50 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 14nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2017. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel Arc Pro B50 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $349 vs $399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 15.3% (35.0 vs 30.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Radeon Pro Vega 56 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel Arc Pro B50

The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 56

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

The Intel Arc Pro B50 scores 12,208 and the Radeon Pro Vega 56 reaches 12,104 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is built on Xe2 while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Raw compute: 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon Pro Vega 56
G3D Mark Score
12,208
12,104
Architecture
Xe2
GCN 5.0
Process Node
5 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048
3584+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)
10.65 TFLOPS+19%
8.96 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2600 MHz+108%
1250 MHz
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
128
224+75%
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon Pro Vega 56
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel Arc Pro B50 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 carries 0 MB. Intel Arc Pro B50 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Intel Arc Pro B50 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 56.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon Pro Vega 56
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon Pro Vega 56
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.4+27%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Decoder: Dual Arc Media Engine vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56).

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon Pro Vega 56
Encoder
Dual Arc Media Engine
VCE 4.0
Decoder
Dual Arc Media Engine
UVD 7.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Arc Pro B50 draws 70W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 56's 210W — a 100% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 167mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon Pro Vega 56
TDP
70W-67%
210W
Recommended PSU
500W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
167mm
267mm
Height
69mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
174.4+203%
57.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel Arc Pro B50 came in at $349, while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 launched at $399. On MSRP, Intel Arc Pro B50 was 12.5% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 30.3 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 offers 15.5% better value. The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro B50 (2025 vs 2017).

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon Pro Vega 56
MSRP
$349-13%
$399
Performance per Dollar
35.0+16%
30.3
Codename
BMG-G21
Vega 10
Release
September 5 2025
August 14 2017
Ranking
#221
#222

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.