Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Radeon PRO V710

Intel

Intel Arc Pro B50

2025Core: 1700 MHzBoost: 2600 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon PRO V710

2024Core: 1900 MHzBoost: 2000 MHz

Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Radeon PRO V710 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Radeon PRO V710 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Radeon PRO V710: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel Arc Pro B50

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,651 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 483% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Draws 70W instead of 158W, a 88W reduction.
  • Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO V710 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Radeon PRO V710

2024

Why buy it

  • 53.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 473.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,000 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
  • 125.7% higher power demand at 158W vs 70W.
  • 59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon PRO V710 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 53.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Intel Arc Pro B50 instead at 12,208 vs 12,000, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Intel Arc Pro B50 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2025 generation instead of 2024. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel Arc Pro B50 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,651 cheaper on MSRP at $349 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 483% (35.0 vs 6.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon PRO V710 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Radeon PRO V710 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel Arc Pro B50

The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.

AMD

Radeon PRO V710

The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The Intel Arc Pro B50 scores 12,208 and the Radeon PRO V710 reaches 12,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is built on Xe2 while the Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710). Raw compute: 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 54 (Radeon PRO V710).

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon PRO V710
G3D Mark Score
12,208+2%
12,000
Architecture
Xe2
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
5 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
2048
3456+69%
Compute (TFLOPS)
10.65 TFLOPS
27.65 TFLOPS+160%
Boost Clock
2600 MHz+30%
2000 MHz
ROPs
16
96+500%
TMUs
128
216+69%
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
16
54+238%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon PRO V710
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Intel Arc Pro B50 and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO V710. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon PRO V710
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon PRO V710
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710). Decoder: Dual Arc Media Engine vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710).

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon PRO V710
Encoder
Dual Arc Media Engine
VCN 4.0
Decoder
Dual Arc Media Engine
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Arc Pro B50 draws 70W versus the Radeon PRO V710's 158W — a 77.2% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon PRO V710
TDP
70W-56%
158W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
167mm
267mm
Height
69mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
174.4+130%
75.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel Arc Pro B50 came in at $349, while the Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000. On MSRP, Intel Arc Pro B50 was 82.5% cheaper ($1651 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 offers 483.3% better value. The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro B50 (2025 vs 2024).

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Radeon PRO V710
MSRP
$349-83%
$2000
Performance per Dollar
35.0+483%
6.0
Codename
BMG-G21
Navi 32
Release
September 5 2025
October 3 2024
Ranking
#221
#196

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.