Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Intel

Intel Arc Pro B50

2025Core: 1700 MHzBoost: 2600 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P5200 Max-Q

2018Core: 1316 MHzBoost: 1569 MHz
Similar parts

Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel Arc Pro B50

2025

Why buy it

  • 2.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 70W instead of 100W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quadro P5200 Max-Q

2018

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Intel Arc Pro B50 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 35.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
  • 42.9% higher power demand at 100W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Intel Arc Pro B50 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P5200 Max-Q instead at 12,308 vs 12,208, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Intel Arc Pro B50 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 16nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2018. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel Arc Pro B50 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel Arc Pro B50

The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.

NVIDIA

Quadro P5200 Max-Q

The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1316 MHz to 1569 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,308 points.

Graphics Performance

The Intel Arc Pro B50 scores 12,208 and the Quadro P5200 Max-Q reaches 12,308 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is built on Xe2 while the Quadro P5200 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Raw compute: 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 8.033 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1569 MHz.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Quadro P5200 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score
12,208
12,308
Architecture
Xe2
Pascal
Process Node
5 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
2048
2560+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
10.65 TFLOPS+33%
8.033 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2600 MHz+66%
1569 MHz
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
128
160+25%
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel Arc Pro B50 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 Max-Q carries 4 GB. Intel Arc Pro B50 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Intel Arc Pro B50 and 256-bit on the Quadro P5200 Max-Q. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Quadro P5200 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Quadro P5200 Max-Q
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.4+27%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Decoder: Dual Arc Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200 Max-Q).

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Encoder
Dual Arc Media Engine
NVENC 5.0
Decoder
Dual Arc Media Engine
PureVideo HD VP7
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Arc Pro B50 draws 70W versus the Quadro P5200 Max-Q's 100W — a 35.3% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 500W (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Quadro P5200 Max-Q
TDP
70W-30%
100W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
167mm
0mm
Height
69mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
174.4+42%
123.1
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro B50 (2025 vs 2018).

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B50Quadro P5200 Max-Q
MSRP
$349
Codename
BMG-G21
GP104
Release
September 5 2025
February 21 2018
Ranking
#221
#217

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.