
Intel Arc Pro B50

Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Why buy it
- ✅2.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 100W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Intel Arc Pro B50 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 35.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 100W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro P5200 Max-Q
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1316 MHz to 1569 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,308 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro B50 scores 12,208 and the Quadro P5200 Max-Q reaches 12,308 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is built on Xe2 while the Quadro P5200 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Raw compute: 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 8.033 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1569 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,208 | 12,308 |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.65 TFLOPS+33% | 8.033 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+66% | 1569 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 128 | 160+25% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Arc Pro B50 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 Max-Q carries 4 GB. Intel Arc Pro B50 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Intel Arc Pro B50 and 256-bit on the Quadro P5200 Max-Q. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Decoder: Dual Arc Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200 Max-Q).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Arc Media Engine | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | Dual Arc Media Engine | PureVideo HD VP7 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro B50 draws 70W versus the Quadro P5200 Max-Q's 100W — a 35.3% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 500W (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-30% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 174.4+42% | 123.1 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro B50 (2025 vs 2018).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | — |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | GP104 |
| Release | September 5 2025 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #221 | #217 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















