Quadro M6000 vs Radeon RX 7400
Quadro M6000
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M6000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7400 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The Radeon RX 7400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M6000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 7400.
| Insight | Quadro M6000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $199 versus $500 for the Quadro M6000, it costs 60% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 148.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M6000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+148.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($199) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M6000 and Radeon RX 7400
Quadro M6000
The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.
Radeon RX 7400
The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M6000 scores 11,769 and the Radeon RX 7400 reaches 11,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M6000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 7400 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 2300 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,769 | 11,654 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+71% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.844 TFLOPS | 16.49 TFLOPS+141% |
| Boost Clock | 1114 MHz | 2300 MHz+106% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+71% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB+120% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro M6000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M6000 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7400 has 8 GB. The Quadro M6000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000) vs 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 7400) — a 147.7% advantage for the Quadro M6000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro M6000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7400) — the Quadro M6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 317 GB/s+148% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+500% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12/1 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M6000 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 7400's 43W — a 141.3% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000) vs 450W (Radeon RX 7400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 43W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.1 | 271.0+475% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M6000 launched at $4999 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199 and now averages $199. The Radeon RX 7400 costs 60.2% less ($301 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.5 (Quadro M6000) vs 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 149.4% better value. The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4999 | $199-96% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $199-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.5 | 58.6+149% |
| Codename | GM200 | Navi 33 |
| Release | March 21 2015 | August 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #228 | #229 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M6000 and Radeon RX 7400
