Quadro M6000
Radeon RX 7400
Quadro M6000 vs Radeon RX 7400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M6000 vs Radeon RX 7400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro M6000 vs Radeon RX 7400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M6000
2015Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7400 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌2015 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌2412.1% HIGHER MSRP$4,999 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 58.6 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅8.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $4,800 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2387.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M6000 vs Radeon RX 7400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro M6000
The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.
Radeon RX 7400
The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M6000 scores 11,769 and the Radeon RX 7400 reaches 11,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M6000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 7400 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 2300 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,769 | 11,654 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+71% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.844 TFLOPS | 16.49 TFLOPS+141% |
| Boost Clock | 1114 MHz | 2300 MHz+106% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+71% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB+120% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro M6000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M6000 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7400 carries 8 GB. Quadro M6000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000) vs 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 7400) — a 147.7% advantage for the Quadro M6000. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro M6000 and 64-bit on the Radeon RX 7400. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro M6000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7400) — the Quadro M6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 317 GB/s+148% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+500% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12/1 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M6000 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 7400's 43W — a 141.3% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000) vs 450W (Radeon RX 7400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 43W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.1 | 271.0+475% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro M6000 came in at $4999, while the Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon RX 7400 was 96% cheaper ($4800 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (Quadro M6000) vs 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 2341.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 7400 (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4999 | $199-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.4 | 58.6+2342% |
| Codename | GM200 | Navi 33 |
| Release | March 21 2015 | August 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #228 | #229 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M6000 and Radeon RX 7400
