Arc A770M vs Quadro M6000 24GB

CPU

GPU

Arc A770M

2022Core: 1650 MHzBoost: 2050 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016Core: 988 MHzBoost: 1114 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Arc A770M vs Quadro M6000 24GB Performance Spectrum

Arc A770M

16 GB 120

11,853

+2.0%

11,625

0.0%

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A770M vs Quadro M6000 24GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A770M vs Quadro M6000 24GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A770M

2022

Why buy it

✅37.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 24 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A770M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 37.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2% in PassMark G3D (11,853 vs 11,625), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A770M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 32 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro M6000 24GB makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro M6000 24GB is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A770M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A770M vs Quadro M6000 24GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A770M

The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

Quadro M6000 24GB

The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770M scores 11,853 and the Quadro M6000 24GB reaches 11,625 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro M6000 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1114 MHz.

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro M6000 24GB
G3D Mark Score	11,853+2%	11,625
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	6 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4096+33%	3072
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.79 TFLOPS+145%	6.844 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2050 MHz+84%	1114 MHz
ROPs	128+33%	96
TMUs	256	256
L1 Cache	6 MB+445%	1.1 MB
L2 Cache	16 MB+433%	3 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro M6000 24GB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770M has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 24GB carries 24 GB. Quadro M6000 24GB gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770M) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000 24GB) — a 61.5% advantage for the Arc A770M. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A770M and 384-bit on the Quadro M6000 24GB. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro M6000 24GB
VRAM Capacity	16 GB	24 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s+62%	317 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	384-bit+50%
L2 Cache	16 MB+433%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro M6000 24GB
DirectX	12.2+2%	12/1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB).

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro M6000 24GB
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	NVENC 4.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 250W — a 70.3% difference. The Arc A770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro M6000 24GB
TDP	120W-52%	250W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	112mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	98.8+112%	46.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A770M (2022 vs 2016).

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro M6000 24GB
MSRP	—	$4999
Codename	DG2-512	GM200
Release	2022	March 5 2016
Ranking	#225	#233

Search Arc A770M on Amazon

Search Quadro M6000 24GB on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.