Arc A770M vs Quadro M6000 24GB

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A770M

2022

Why buy it

✅38.1% more average FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770M across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.

Arc A770M

2022

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016

Why buy it

✅38.1% more average FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770M across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.

Quick Answers

So, is Arc A770M better than Quadro M6000 24GB?

Yes. Arc A770M is clearly the better overall GPU here. Arc A770M averages 38.1% more FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 11,853 vs 11,625 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Arc A770M is a 2022 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Quadro M6000 24GB is a 2016 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A770M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 6nm process instead of 28nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Arc A770M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Arc A770M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $4,999 MSRP, and you are getting 38.1% more estimated average FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.0% higher G3D Mark. Quadro M6000 24GB really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Quadro M6000 24GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Quadro M6000 24GB is 2016 hardware with 24 GB of VRAM, 11,625 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A770M Benchmark Check

Quadro M6000 24GB Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A770M	Quadro M6000 24GB
1080p
low	223 FPS	160 FPS
medium	207 FPS	142 FPS
high	181 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	86 FPS
1440p
low	202 FPS	140 FPS
medium	170 FPS	120 FPS
high	140 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	61 FPS
4K
low	137 FPS	67 FPS
medium	115 FPS	58 FPS
high	92 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	35 FPS

Open Arc A770M Open Quadro M6000 24GB

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A770M	Quadro M6000 24GB
1080p
low	376 FPS	191 FPS
medium	324 FPS	168 FPS
high	263 FPS	136 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	105 FPS
1440p
low	232 FPS	131 FPS
medium	204 FPS	106 FPS
high	167 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	63 FPS
4K
low	118 FPS	62 FPS
medium	98 FPS	52 FPS
high	83 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	64 FPS	38 FPS

Open Arc A770M Open Quadro M6000 24GB

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A770M	Quadro M6000 24GB
1080p
low	533 FPS	523 FPS
medium	427 FPS	418 FPS
high	356 FPS	349 FPS
ultra	267 FPS	262 FPS
1440p
low	400 FPS	392 FPS
medium	320 FPS	314 FPS
high	267 FPS	262 FPS
ultra	200 FPS	196 FPS
4K
low	267 FPS	262 FPS
medium	213 FPS	209 FPS
high	178 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	131 FPS

Open Arc A770M Open Quadro M6000 24GB

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A770M	Quadro M6000 24GB
1080p
low	533 FPS	233 FPS
medium	427 FPS	200 FPS
high	356 FPS	166 FPS
ultra	267 FPS	138 FPS
1440p
low	400 FPS	179 FPS
medium	320 FPS	157 FPS
high	267 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	200 FPS	102 FPS
4K
low	267 FPS	102 FPS
medium	213 FPS	82 FPS
high	178 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	52 FPS

Open Arc A770M Open Quadro M6000 24GB

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770M and Quadro M6000 24GB

Arc A770M

The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

Quadro M6000 24GB

The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770M scores 11,853 and the Quadro M6000 24GB reaches 11,625 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro M6000 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1114 MHz.

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro M6000 24GB
G3D Mark Score	11,853+2%	11,625
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	6 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4096+33%	3072
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.79 TFLOPS+145%	6.844 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2050 MHz+84%	1114 MHz
ROPs	128+33%	96
TMUs	256	256
L1 Cache	6 MB+445%	1.1 MB
L2 Cache	16 MB+433%	3 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro M6000 24GB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770M comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 24GB has 24 GB. The Quadro M6000 24GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770M) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000 24GB) — a 61.5% advantage for the Arc A770M. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro M6000 24GB
VRAM Capacity	16 GB	24 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s+62%	317 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	384-bit+50%
L2 Cache	16 MB+433%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro M6000 24GB
DirectX	12.2+2%	12/1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB).

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro M6000 24GB
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	NVENC 4.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 250W — a 70.3% difference. The Arc A770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro M6000 24GB
TDP	120W-52%	250W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	112mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	98.8+112%	46.5