G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M6000 24GB vs Quadro P4000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M6000 24GB vs Quadro P4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016

Why buy it

✅23.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 24 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
513.4% HIGHER MSRP
$4,999 MSRPvs$815 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
❌138.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 105W.
❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.

Quadro P4000

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,184 less on MSRP ($815 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 503.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($815 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 250W, a 145W reduction.
✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 24GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro M6000 24GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (11,625 vs 11,431), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro M6000 24GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 24 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P4000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4,184 cheaper on MSRP at $815 vs $4,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 503.1% (14.0 vs 2.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro P4000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro M6000 24GB has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro M6000 24GB vs Quadro P4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M6000 24GB

The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.

Quadro P4000

The Quadro P4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1202 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 105W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,431 points. Launch price was $815.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M6000 24GB scores 11,625 and the Quadro P4000 reaches 11,431 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M6000 24GB is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro P4000 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 1,792 (Quadro P4000). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 5.304 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 1480 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	Quadro P4000
G3D Mark Score	11,625+2%	11,431
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	3072+71%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.844 TFLOPS+29%	5.304 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1114 MHz	1480 MHz+33%
ROPs	96+50%	64
TMUs	256+129%	112
L1 Cache	1.1 MB+67%	0.66 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+50%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	Quadro P4000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M6000 24GB has 24 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P4000 carries 8 GB. Quadro M6000 24GB gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro M6000 24GB and 256-bit on the Quadro P4000. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 2 MB (Quadro P4000) — the Quadro M6000 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	Quadro P4000
VRAM Capacity	24 GB+200%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	384-bit+50%	256-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+50%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 12.0 (Quadro P4000). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	Quadro P4000
DirectX	12/1	12.0
Vulkan	1.1+10%	1.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P4000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P4000).

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	Quadro P4000
Encoder	NVENC 4.0	6th Gen NVENC
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP6	PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M6000 24GB draws 250W versus the Quadro P4000's 105W — a 81.7% difference. The Quadro P4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 500W (Quadro P4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	Quadro P4000
TDP	250W	105W-58%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	241mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	46.5	108.9+134%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro M6000 24GB came in at $4999, while the Quadro P4000 launched at $815. On MSRP, Quadro P4000 was 83.7% cheaper ($4184 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.3 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 14.0 (Quadro P4000) — the Quadro P4000 offers 508.7% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P4000 (2017 vs 2016).

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	Quadro P4000
MSRP	$4999	$815-84%
Performance per Dollar	2.3	14.0+509%
Codename	GM200	GP104
Release	March 5 2016	February 6 2017
Ranking	#233	#239

Search Quadro M6000 24GB on Amazon

Search Quadro P4000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.