Quadro M6000 24GB
Radeon PRO W6600M
Quadro M6000 24GB vs Radeon PRO W6600M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M6000 24GB vs Radeon PRO W6600M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro M6000 24GB vs Radeon PRO W6600M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M6000 24GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅11.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 24 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 250W vs 90W.
Radeon PRO W6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 250W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 24GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M6000 24GB vs Radeon PRO W6600M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro M6000 24GB
The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Radeon PRO W6600M
The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M6000 24GB scores 11,625 and the Radeon PRO W6600M reaches 11,407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M6000 24GB is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon PRO W6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 2034 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,625+2% | 11,407 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+71% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.844 TFLOPS | 7.29 TFLOPS+7% |
| Boost Clock | 1114 MHz | 2034 MHz+83% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+129% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB+120% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M6000 24GB has 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600M carries 8 GB. Quadro M6000 24GB gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600M) — a 41.5% advantage for the Quadro M6000 24GB. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro M6000 24GB and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6600M. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600M) — the Quadro M6000 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+200% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 317 GB/s+42% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12/1 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 5+25% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M6000 24GB draws 250W versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 90W — a 94.1% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 90W-64% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 46.5 | 126.7+172% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6600M (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4999 | — |
| Codename | GM200 | Navi 23 |
| Release | March 5 2016 | June 8 2021 |
| Ranking | #233 | #240 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M6000 24GB and Radeon PRO W6600M
