Radeon PRO W6600M vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Radeon PRO W6600M
Popular choices:
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6600M
Performance Per Dollar RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W6600M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6600M | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon PRO W6600M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6600M and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Radeon PRO W6600M
The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6600M scores 11,407 and the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 11,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6600M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2034 MHz vs 2025 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 16 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 64.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,407+2% | 11,162 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.29 TFLOPS | 8.294 TFLOPS+14% |
| Boost Clock | 2034 MHz | 2025 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+75% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28+75% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 128 GB/s (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 75% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6600M. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+75% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 5+25% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6600M draws 90W versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 35W — a 88% difference. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W | 35W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 126.7 | 318.9+152% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W6600M and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
