Radeon PRO W6600M vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon PRO W6600M vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon PRO W6600M vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021

Why buy it

✅4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌157.1% higher power demand at 90W vs 35W.

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

2024

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 90W, a 55W reduction.
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon PRO W6600M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (11,407 vs 11,162), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 7nm and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2021. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon PRO W6600M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon PRO W6600M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon PRO W6600M vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W6600M

The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W6600M scores 11,407 and the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 11,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6600M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2034 MHz vs 2025 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 16 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 64.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6600M	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score	11,407+2%	11,162
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	7 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	1792	2048+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	7.29 TFLOPS	8.294 TFLOPS+14%
Boost Clock	2034 MHz	2025 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	112+75%	64
L1 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB	12 MB+500%
Ray Tracing Cores	28+75%	16

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W6600M does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W6600M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6600M	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	DLSS 4 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 4)
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 128 GB/s (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 75% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6600M. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6600M and 64-bit on the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6600M	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	224 GB/s+75%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	12 MB+500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6600M	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.2	1.4+17%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	5+25%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile).

Feature	Radeon PRO W6600M	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder	VCN 3.0	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	VCN 3.0	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W6600M draws 90W versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 35W — a 88% difference. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6600M	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP	90W	35W-61%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	126.7	318.9+152%