GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) vs Radeon PRO W6600M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) vs Radeon PRO W6600M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) vs Radeon PRO W6600M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)

2023

Why buy it

✅13.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌27.8% higher power demand at 115W vs 90W.

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅Draws 90W instead of 115W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 13.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon PRO W6600M instead at 11,407 vs 11,353, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 7nm and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) vs Radeon PRO W6600M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)

The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1545 MHz to 1890 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,353 points.

Radeon PRO W6600M

The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) scores 11,353 and the Radeon PRO W6600M reaches 11,407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Raw compute: 11.61 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M). Boost clocks: 1890 MHz vs 2034 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W6600M) with 96 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
G3D Mark Score	11,353	11,407
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	3072+71%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	11.61 TFLOPS+59%	7.29 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1890 MHz	2034 MHz+8%
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	96	112+17%
L1 Cache	3 MB+500%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	24	28+17%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W6600M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600M carries 8 GB. Radeon PRO W6600M gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600M) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile). Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6600M. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600M) — the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	336 GB/s+50%	224 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 5.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+17%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	5+67%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) draws 115W versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 90W — a 24.4% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
TDP	115W	90W-22%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	98.7	126.7+28%