GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Radeon Pro Vega 48
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) vs Radeon Pro Vega 48: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
2023Why buy it
- ✅38.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 25.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌283.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 30W.
Radeon Pro Vega 48
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 115W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1545 MHz to 1890 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,353 points.
Radeon Pro Vega 48
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,270 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) scores 11,353 and the Radeon Pro Vega 48 reaches 11,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 3,072 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Raw compute: 11.61 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Boost clocks: 1890 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,353 | 11,270 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.61 TFLOPS+45% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1890 MHz+45% | 1300 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 192+100% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+300% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 carries 0 MB. GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 48. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 48) — the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 48).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) draws 115W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 48's 30W — a 117.2% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 30W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 98.7 | 375.7+281% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $450 |
| Codename | AD107 | Vega 10 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | March 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #102 | #241 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) and Radeon Pro Vega 48
