GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Performance Per Dollar RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1545 MHz to 1890 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,353 points.
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) scores 11,353 and the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 11,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 11.61 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1890 MHz vs 2025 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 16 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) with 96 Tensor cores vs 64.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,353+2% | 11,162 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+50% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.61 TFLOPS+40% | 8.294 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1890 MHz | 2025 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+50% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+167% | 12 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24+50% | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 96+50% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has 8 GB. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 128 GB/s (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 162.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile). Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+163% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+167% | 12 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) draws 115W versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 35W — a 106.7% difference. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 35W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 98.7 | 318.9+223% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
