G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

2021

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 40W instead of 90W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌125% higher power demand at 90W vs 40W.

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

2021

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 40W instead of 90W, a 50W reduction.

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌125% higher power demand at 90W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) better than Radeon PRO W6600M?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 11,715 vs 11,407 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is the overall package: you are getting DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, plus much lower power draw (40W vs 90W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 2.7% higher G3D Mark. Moving to an unclear MSRP gets you lower power draw (40W vs 90W), and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Is Radeon PRO W6600M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon PRO W6600M is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below an unclear MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W6600M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	132 FPS	140 FPS
medium	111 FPS	118 FPS
high	93 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	71 FPS
1440p
low	113 FPS	112 FPS
medium	93 FPS	92 FPS
high	68 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	52 FPS
4K
low	40 FPS	50 FPS
medium	36 FPS	43 FPS
high	22 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	19 FPS	28 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)Open Radeon PRO W6600M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	111 FPS	243 FPS
medium	87 FPS	206 FPS
high	68 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	52 FPS	134 FPS
1440p
low	81 FPS	170 FPS
medium	61 FPS	142 FPS
high	48 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	88 FPS
4K
low	50 FPS	93 FPS
medium	39 FPS	78 FPS
high	30 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	22 FPS	49 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)Open Radeon PRO W6600M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	516 FPS	513 FPS
medium	422 FPS	411 FPS
high	351 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	264 FPS	257 FPS
1440p
low	377 FPS	385 FPS
medium	316 FPS	308 FPS
high	264 FPS	257 FPS
ultra	198 FPS	192 FPS
4K
low	227 FPS	257 FPS
medium	201 FPS	205 FPS
high	148 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	128 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)Open Radeon PRO W6600M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	267 FPS	262 FPS
medium	227 FPS	231 FPS
high	184 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	146 FPS	157 FPS
1440p
low	197 FPS	199 FPS
medium	171 FPS	176 FPS
high	133 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	113 FPS
4K
low	108 FPS	117 FPS
medium	85 FPS	99 FPS
high	69 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	60 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)Open Radeon PRO W6600M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) and Radeon PRO W6600M

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1410 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,715 points.

Radeon PRO W6600M

The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) scores 11,715 and the Radeon PRO W6600M reaches 11,407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Raw compute: 2.527 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) vs 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M). Boost clocks: 1410 MHz vs 2034 MHz.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
G3D Mark Score	11,715+3%	11,407
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	896	1792+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.527 TFLOPS	7.29 TFLOPS+188%
Boost Clock	1410 MHz	2034 MHz+44%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	112+100%
L1 Cache	896 KB+75%	512 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W6600M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600M) — the Radeon PRO W6600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.1	1.2+9%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	5+25%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M).

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	VCN 3.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) draws 40W versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 90W — a 76.9% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
TDP	40W-56%	90W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85°C	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	292.9+131%	126.7