Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) vs RTX A4000H

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) vs RTX A4000H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) vs RTX A4000H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

2021

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 40W instead of 140W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

RTX A4000H

2021

Why buy it

✅83.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌250% higher power demand at 140W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX A4000H is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 83.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (11,815 vs 11,715), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while RTX A4000H is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RTX A4000H makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RTX A4000H is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) vs RTX A4000H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1410 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,715 points.

RTX A4000H

The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) scores 11,715 and the RTX A4000H reaches 11,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is built on Turing while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 2.527 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 1410 MHz vs 1560 MHz.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	RTX A4000H
G3D Mark Score	11,715	11,815
Architecture	Turing	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	896	6144+586%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.527 TFLOPS	19.17 TFLOPS+659%
Boost Clock	1410 MHz	1560 MHz+11%
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	56	192+243%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	6 MB+582%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX A4000H does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX A4000H supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	RTX A4000H
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) and 192-bit on the RTX A4000H. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000H) — the RTX A4000H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	RTX A4000H
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+33%	192-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	RTX A4000H
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) vs None (RTX A4000H).

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	RTX A4000H
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	None
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	None
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	None

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) draws 40W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 111.1% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	RTX A4000H
TDP	40W-71%	140W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	241mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	292.9+247%	84.4