
Radeon RX 7700 XT vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Radeon RX 7700 XT
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7700 XT
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 7700 XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7700 XT | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $330 versus $380 for the Radeon RX 7700 XT, it costs 13% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 18.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7700 XT | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+18.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($330) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7700 XT and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Radeon RX 7700 XT
The Radeon RX 7700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 25 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1435 MHz to 2544 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,654 points. Launch price was $449.

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 290W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,295 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 7700 XT scores 22,654 and the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti reaches 23,295 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7700 XT is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,456 (Radeon RX 7700 XT) vs 6,144 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti). Raw compute: 35.17 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7700 XT) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti). Boost clocks: 2544 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 54 RT cores (Radeon RX 7700 XT) vs 48 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 192.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7700 XT | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,654 | 23,295+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3456 | 6144+78% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.17 TFLOPS+62% | 21.75 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2544 MHz+44% | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 216+13% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 6 MB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 54+13% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7700 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7700 XT | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7700 XT comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7700 XT offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 7700 XT) vs 608 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) — a 40.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7700 XT) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7700 XT | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 608 GB/s+41% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7700 XT) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7700 XT | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7700 XT) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7700 XT) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7700 XT | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7700 XT draws 245W versus the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti's 290W — a 16.8% difference. The Radeon RX 7700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (Radeon RX 7700 XT) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 55°C vs 78°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7700 XT | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 245W-16% | 290W |
| Recommended PSU | 700W-7% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 55°C-29% | 78°C |
| Perf/Watt | 92.5+15% | 80.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7700 XT launched at $449 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti launched at $599 and now averages $330. The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti costs 13.2% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.6 (Radeon RX 7700 XT) vs 70.6 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti offers 18.5% better value. The Radeon RX 7700 XT is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7700 XT | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449-25% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $330-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.6 | 70.6+18% |
| Codename | Navi 32 | GA104 |
| Release | August 25 2023 | May 31 2021 |
| Ranking | #58 | #50 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















