
Radeon RX 9070 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Radeon RX 9070
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 9070
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 9070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.5% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (16 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 4000 Ada Generation.
| Insight | Radeon RX 9070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 4.0 (2025) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 9070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $550 versus $1,547 for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation, it costs 64% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 196.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 9070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+196.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($550) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,547) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 9070 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Radeon RX 9070
The Radeon RX 9070 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 6 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1330 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,380 points. Launch price was $549.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 9070 scores 25,380 versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 24,046 — the Radeon RX 9070 leads by 5.5%. The Radeon RX 9070 is built on RDNA 4.0 while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon RX 9070) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 36.13 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 9070) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 56 RT cores (Radeon RX 9070) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) with 112 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | Radeon RX 9070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 25,380+6% | 24,046 |
| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 6144+71% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 36.13 TFLOPS+35% | 26.73 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+62% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+100% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+17% | 192 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 48 MB+500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 56+17% | 48 |
| Tensor Cores | 112 | 192+71% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX 9070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 9070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 9070 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 9070 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 640 GB/s (Radeon RX 9070) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 77.8% advantage for the Radeon RX 9070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon RX 9070) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 9070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+700% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 640 GB/s+78% | 360 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+60% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 48 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 9070) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 9070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 9070) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: Dual Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1 (Radeon RX 9070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | Radeon RX 9070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Media Engine | 8th Gen NVENC (3x) |
| Decoder | Dual Media Engine | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 9070 draws 220W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 103.4% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 9070) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 9070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 70W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 110mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 115.4 | 343.5+198% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 9070 launched at $549 MSRP and currently averages $550, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999 and now averages $1547. The Radeon RX 9070 costs 64.4% less ($997 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 46.1 (Radeon RX 9070) vs 15.5 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the Radeon RX 9070 offers 197.4% better value. The Radeon RX 9070 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | Radeon RX 9070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-73% | $1999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $550-64% | $1547 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.1+197% | 15.5 |
| Codename | Navi 48 | AD104 |
| Release | March 6 2025 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #39 | #47 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















