
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon RX 9070

GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 9070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 9070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 9070 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 4.0 (2025) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $550 (vs $550), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 6.1% better value per dollar than the Radeon RX 9070.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+6.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon RX 9070

GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 9070
The Radeon RX 9070 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 6 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1330 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,380 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon RX 9070's 25,380 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 6.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 9070 uses RDNA 4.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3,584 (Radeon RX 9070). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 36.13 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 9070). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 56 (Radeon RX 9070) with 184 Tensor cores vs 112.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+6% | 25,380 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+64% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS | 36.13 TFLOPS+24% |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz | 2520 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 64 | 128+100% |
| TMUs | 184 | 224+22% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+350% | 8 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 56+22% |
| Tensor Cores | 184+64% | 112 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX 9070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 9070 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 9070 has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 9070 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 640 GB/s (Radeon RX 9070) — a 27% advantage for the Radeon RX 9070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 9070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 640 GB/s+27% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+350% | 8 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 9070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 9070). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Dual Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (Radeon RX 9070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | Dual Media Engine |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Dual Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 9070's 220W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 650W (Radeon RX 9070). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-9% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 267mm |
| Height | 137mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+17% | 115.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $550, while the Radeon RX 9070 launched at $549 and now averages $550. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 46.1 (Radeon RX 9070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 6.1% better value. The Radeon RX 9070 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $549-8% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $550 | $550 |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.9+6% | 46.1 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 48 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | March 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #32 | #39 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














