GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

2023Core: 1920 MHzBoost: 2475 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

2022Core: 915 MHzBoost: 2505 MHz
RTX family
·······

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $6,200 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
  • Delivers 973.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 200W instead of 300W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RTX 6000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 568), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
  • 13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

2022

Why buy it

  • 27.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 208.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (568 vs 184).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
  • Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 1035.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $6,799 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($6,799 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • 50% higher power demand at 300W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 27.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 5.7% in PassMark G3D (28,454 vs 26,919), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2022. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $6,200 cheaper on MSRP at $599 vs $6,799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 973.8% (44.9 vs 4.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. RTX 6000 Ada Generation still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,454 points. Launch price was $6,799.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 28,454 — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads by 5.7%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 18,176 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 91.06 TFLOPS (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2505 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 142 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) with 184 Tensor cores vs 568.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070RTX 6000 Ada Generation
G3D Mark Score
26,919
28,454+6%
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
5 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
5888
18176+209%
Compute (TFLOPS)
29.15 TFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS+212%
Boost Clock
2475 MHz
2505 MHz+1%
ROPs
64
192+200%
TMUs
184
568+209%
L1 Cache
5.8 MB
17.8 MB+207%
L2 Cache
36 MB
96 MB+167%
Ray Tracing Cores
46
142+209%
Tensor Cores
184
568+209%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 6000 Ada Generation supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation carries 48 GB. RTX 6000 Ada Generation gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 960 GB/s (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — a 90.5% advantage for the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 384-bit on the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 96 MB (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070RTX 6000 Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity
12 GB
48 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR6X
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
504 GB/s
960 GB/s+90%
Bus Width
192-bit
384-bit+100%
L2 Cache
36 MB
96 MB+167%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070RTX 6000 Ada Generation
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC (2x)
NVENC 8th Gen
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
NVDEC 5th Gen
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 300W — a 40% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070RTX 6000 Ada Generation
TDP
200W-33%
300W
Recommended PSU
650W
500W-23%
Power Connector
8-pin
16-pin
Length
304mm
267mm
Height
137mm
112mm
Slots
3
2-33%
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
134.6+42%
94.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation launched at $6799. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 was 91.2% cheaper ($6200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 969% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2022).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070RTX 6000 Ada Generation
MSRP
$599-91%
$6799
Performance per Dollar
44.9+969%
4.2
Codename
AD104
AD102
Release
April 12 2023
December 3 2022
Ranking
#32
#24

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.