
Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U vs Radeon R9 M385

Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M385
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M385
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M385 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M385 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 M385 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $300 for the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 391.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+391.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U and Radeon R9 M385

Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U
The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,095 points.

Radeon R9 M385
The Radeon R9 M385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U scores 2,095 and the Radeon R9 M385 reaches 2,061 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M385 uses GCN 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M385). Raw compute: 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385). Boost clocks: 1845 MHz vs 1100 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,095+2% | 2,061 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+57% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.196 TFLOPS+190% | 1.792 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1845 MHz+68% | 1100 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 88+57% | 56 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M385 has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M385 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 96 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U draws 110W versus the Radeon R9 M385's 75W — a 37.8% difference. The Radeon R9 M385 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M385). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W | 75W-32% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 19.0 | 27.5+45% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon R9 M385 launched at $300 and now averages $60. The Radeon R9 M385 costs 80% less ($240 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.0 (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U) vs 34.4 (Radeon R9 M385) — the Radeon R9 M385 offers 391.4% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $60-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.0 | 34.4+391% |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Strato |
| Release | October 7 2019 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #297 | #674 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















