Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
VS
Radeon R9 M270X

Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U vs Radeon R9 M270X

AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U

2015Boost: 975 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M270X

2014Core: 725 MHzBoost: 775 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U is positioned at rank 278 and the Radeon R9 M270X is on rank 484, so the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
2084%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2003%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1979%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1976%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1972%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1961%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1936%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1929%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1911%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1906%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1883%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1879%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1845%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1844%
#263
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
2299%
#278
Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
100%
#279
Radeon R4
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#281
Radeon R7 A10-8750
MSRP: $250|Avg: $30
98%
#282
Radeon HD 6410D
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
97%
#284
Radeon HD 3850 AGP
MSRP: $130|Avg: $130
95%
#285
Radeon R9 M280X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
94%
#286
Radeon HD 5470
MSRP: $83|Avg: $83
93%
#287
GeForce GT 220
MSRP: $69|Avg: $49
93%
#288
Radeon R7 A10-8850
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
89%
#290
GeForce G210
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
85%
#291
Radeon HD 4850 X2
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
82%
#292
Radeon HD 4330
MSRP: $50|Avg: $9
78%
#293
GeForce GTX 260
MSRP: $449|Avg: $449
77%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M270X

#474
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2252%
#476
2042%
#477
2037%
#481
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1852%
#482
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1839%
#484
Radeon R9 M270X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
100%
#485
Mobility Radeon HD 5470
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
100%
#486
99%
#487
Radeon R7 M260
MSRP: $110|Avg: $110
99%
#488
99%
#489
Radeon R7 A10-7800
MSRP: $155|Avg: $30
99%
#490
Radeon HD 8450G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#491
98%
#492
Radeon HD 6450A
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
98%
#493
98%
#494
97%
#495
94%
#497
Radeon HD 8180
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
93%
#499
Radeon R8 M535DX
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M270X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon Ryzen 7 3700URadeon R9 M270X
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 M270X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M270X holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $350), it costs 89% less, resulting in a 765.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon Ryzen 7 3700URadeon R9 M270X
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+765.7%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350)
More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U and Radeon R9 M270X

AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U

The Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,217 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon R9 M270X

The Radeon R9 M270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,204 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U scores 1,217 and the Radeon R9 M270X reaches 1,204 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M270X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M270X). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M270X). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 775 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 7 3700URadeon R9 M270X
G3D Mark Score
1,217+1%
1,204
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024+60%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.997 TFLOPS+101%
0.992 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
975 MHz+26%
775 MHz
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
64+60%
40
L1 Cache
256 KB+60%
160 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 7 3700URadeon R9 M270X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M270X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M270X offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M270X) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 7 3700URadeon R9 M270X
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 M270X's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M270X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M270X). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 7 3700URadeon R9 M270X
TDP
100W
75W-25%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
Mobile
Perf/Watt
12.2
16.1+32%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $350, while the Radeon R9 M270X launched at $250 and now averages $40. The Radeon R9 M270X costs 88.6% less ($310 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.5 (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U) vs 30.1 (Radeon R9 M270X) — the Radeon R9 M270X offers 760% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 7 3700URadeon R9 M270X
MSRP
$350
$250-29%
Avg Price (30d)
$350
$40-89%
Performance per Dollar
3.5
30.1+760%
Codename
Trinidad
Venus
Release
June 18 2015
March 21 2014
Ranking
#467
#819