Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
VS
Radeon R9 270X

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H vs Radeon R9 270X

AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

2020Core: 1700 MHzBoost: 2105 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 270X

2013Boost: 1050 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

#61
GeForce RTX 4080
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $800
169%
#62
Arc A310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
166%
#63
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
MSRP: $799|Avg: $800
164%
#64
Radeon RX 9070 XT
MSRP: $599|Avg: $700
159%
#65
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
MSRP: $749|Avg: $850
158%
#66
Radeon RX 6900 XT
MSRP: $999|Avg: $385
158%
#67
GeForce GTX 1630
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
152%
#68
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
141%
#69
Radeon RX 6800 XT
MSRP: $649|Avg: $743
139%
#70
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
MSRP: $999|Avg: $930
139%
#71
Radeon RX 6950 XT
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $850
136%
#72
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $550
132%
#73
GeForce RTX 3080 12GB
MSRP: $1250|Avg: $500
125%
#74
GeForce RTX 5080
MSRP: $999|Avg: $1250
118%
#75
GeForce RTX 3090
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $900
104%
#76
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
100%
#77
GeForce RTX 4090
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1649
95%
#78
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1100
87%
#79
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
MSRP: $55|Avg: $40
60%
#80
GeForce RTX 5090
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $2700
59%
#81
Moore Threads MTT S80
MSRP: $260|Avg: $170
57%
#82
Intel UHD Graphics P750
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
51%
#83
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP: $299|Avg: $100
50%
#84
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
41%
#85
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
39%
#86
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
38%
#87
Radeon RX 7500
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
34%
#88
Radeon Ryzen 5 5500H
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
33%
#89
Moore Threads MTT S70
MSRP: $345|Avg: $140
32%
#90
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $4086.44
31%
#91
Radeon Ryzen 5 150
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
31%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 270X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 270X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H.

InsightRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HRadeon R9 270X
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Longevity
RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 270X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $200 for the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H, it costs 80% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 402.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HRadeon R9 270X
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+402.3%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200)
More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H and Radeon R9 270X

AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,852 points. Launch price was $579.

AMD

Radeon R9 270X

The Radeon R9 270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,874 points. Launch price was $199.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H scores 4,852 and the Radeon R9 270X reaches 4,874 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R9 270X uses GCN 1.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270X). Raw compute: 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) vs 2.688 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270X). Boost clocks: 2105 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HRadeon R9 270X
G3D Mark Score
4,852
4,874
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
7 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
3840+200%
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.17 TFLOPS+502%
2.688 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2105 MHz+100%
1050 MHz
ROPs
96+200%
32
TMUs
240+200%
80
L1 Cache
768 KB+140%
320 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HRadeon R9 270X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 270X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270X) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HRadeon R9 270X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
179.2 GB/s
Bus Width
System
256-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H draws 250W versus the Radeon R9 270X's 180W — a 32.6% difference. The Radeon R9 270X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270X). Power connectors: None vs 2x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HRadeon R9 270X
TDP
250W
180W-28%
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
None
2x 6-pin
Length
241mm
Height
109mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
80 C
Perf/Watt
19.4
27.1+40%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Radeon R9 270X launched at $199 and now averages $40. The Radeon R9 270X costs 80% less ($160 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.3 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) vs 121.8 (Radeon R9 270X) — the Radeon R9 270X offers 401.2% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HRadeon R9 270X
MSRP
$200
$199
Avg Price (30d)
$200
$40-80%
Performance per Dollar
24.3
121.8+401%
Codename
Navi 21
Curacao
Release
October 28 2020
October 8 2013
Ranking
#65
#448