Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U vs Intel UHD Graphics 617
Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics 617
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics 617 uses modern memory architecture. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 617.
| Insight | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Vega (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U and Intel UHD Graphics 617
Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 26 2017. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 832 points.
Intel UHD Graphics 617
The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 819 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U scores 832 and the Intel UHD Graphics 617 reaches 819 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is built on Vega while the Intel UHD Graphics 617 uses Generation 9.5, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Raw compute: 1.843 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U) vs 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 832+2% | 819 |
| Architecture | Vega | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+167% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.843 TFLOPS+357% | 0.4032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz+14% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 8+167% | 3 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U) vs 12_1 (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U) vs QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs QuickSync.
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U draws 15W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 617's 15W — a 0% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 55.5+2% | 54.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Intel UHD Graphics 617 launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 617) — the Intel UHD Graphics 617 offers NaN% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Vega Raven Ridge | Amber Lake GT2 |
| Release | October 26 2017 | November 7 2018 |
| Ranking | #721 | #921 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U and Intel UHD Graphics 617
