Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U vs FirePro 3D V4800
Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
Popular choices:
FirePro 3D V4800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V4800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 3D V4800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V4800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (1 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U.
| Insight | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Vega (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro 3D V4800 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U and FirePro 3D V4800
Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 26 2017. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 832 points.
FirePro 3D V4800
The FirePro 3D V4800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 854 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U scores 832 and the FirePro 3D V4800 reaches 854 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is built on Vega while the FirePro 3D V4800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U) vs 800 (FirePro 3D V4800). Raw compute: 1.843 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U) vs 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V4800).
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 832 | 854+3% |
| Architecture | Vega | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 800+56% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.843 TFLOPS+67% | 1.104 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V4800 has 1 GB. The FirePro 3D V4800 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U) vs 11.2 (FirePro 3D V4800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+7% | 11.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U) vs UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V4800). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V4800).
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | UVD 2.3 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U draws 15W versus the FirePro 3D V4800's 74W — a 132.6% difference. The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V4800). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 74W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.5+383% | 11.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the FirePro 3D V4800 launched at $189 and now averages $20. The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U costs 100+% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U) vs 42.7 (FirePro 3D V4800) — the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $189 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 42.7 |
| Codename | Vega Raven Ridge | Juniper |
| Release | October 26 2017 | April 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #721 | #780 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U and FirePro 3D V4800
