Radeon RX 7600 vs FirePro 3D V4800
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
FirePro 3D V4800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V4800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2010). The Radeon RX 7600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 3D V4800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1841.6% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (8 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V4800.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1841.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1841.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $250 (vs $20), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 55.3% better value per dollar than the FirePro 3D V4800.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+55.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and FirePro 3D V4800
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
FirePro 3D V4800
The FirePro 3D V4800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 854 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the FirePro 3D V4800's 854 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 1841.6%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the FirePro 3D V4800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 6 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 800 (FirePro 3D V4800). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V4800).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+1842% | 854 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+156% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+1870% | 1.104 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+220% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+540% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The FirePro 3D V4800 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V4800 has 1 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro 3D V4800) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+700% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 11.2 (FirePro 3D V4800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+9% | 11.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600) vs UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V4800). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V4800).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | UVD 2.3 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the FirePro 3D V4800's 74W — a 76.2% difference. The FirePro 3D V4800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V4800). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 74W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5+774% | 11.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the FirePro 3D V4800 launched at $189 and now averages $20. The FirePro 3D V4800 costs 92% less ($230 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 42.7 (FirePro 3D V4800) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 55.3% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269 | $189-30% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $20-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.3+55% | 42.7 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | Juniper |
| Release | May 24 2023 | April 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #118 | #780 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7600 and FirePro 3D V4800
