
Radeon Vega 3 vs Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU

Radeon Vega 3
Popular choices:

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Vega 3 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU.
| Insight | Radeon Vega 3 | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Vega 3 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Vega 3 and Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU

Radeon Vega 3
The Radeon Vega 3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2021. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 892 points.
Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 889 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Vega 3 scores 892 and the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU reaches 889 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 892 | 889 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (Radeon Vega 3) vs 12_0 (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12_0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+44% | 3.2 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon Vega 3) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU).
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 1.0 | — |
| Decoder | VCN 1.0 | — |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Vega 3 draws 45W versus the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU's 7W — a 146.2% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Vega 3) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W | 7W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 19.8 | 127.0+541% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Vega 3 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Vega 3) vs Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) — the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU offers NaN% better value. The Radeon Vega 3 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Cezanne | — |
| Release | April 13 2021 | December 6 2018 |
| Ranking | #601 | #916 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















